World Wide Exposé Lives

Wine Country Abduction Story Of The Century

2011-09-28T23:57:00.000-07:00

If there was ever a story about child abduction that defies comprehension, this is the one.

My husband James and I moved to Montana seeking a peaceful and quiet life, a change from San Francisco. Settling into a historic landmark in Helena, we awaited the near arrival of our son while James bought the necessary equipment for starting his web development business. Our plans were interrupted suddenly when, at 37 weeks, my body without warning spun into five grand mal seizures.

The next event that I remember is waking up in a hospital in Salt Lake City, Utah, and a nurse asking me if I remembered being pregnant. She gave me the phone to talk to James. With a steady pace, he told me the story of the baby, and re-oriented me to the facts of our lives.

He explained how the hospital sent me to Utah for "dialysis" when no dialysis was necessary, and the medical team had also saved the baby's life after they had taken three hours to arrive for him. Our son spent three hours gasping for air without adequate equipment while the system took its sweet time getting to him. We were now separated in three different cities; James was in Helena, baby James was transferred to Great Falls, Montana, and I remained in Utah recovering from a 3-day medically-induced coma.

The hospital was intent on not letting me go and stalling me until the psychiatrist was done condemning me for alleged "delirium" which he later on admitted to me did not exist. For this reason, needed shoulder surgery was procrastinated for seventeen days. During this time I was denied adequate food and water which weakened me.

The psychiatrist's evaluation was well-prepared. He asked me many questions, presented audio and visual materials designed to create adverse reactions, and mentioned case specific information pertaining to my other two children in California. I kept in almost daily contact with James, who said that a C.P.S. social worker, Jim Abrahamson, had began harassing him in Montana and stated in a cocky manner that he and the hospital in Utah had been sharing my medical information.

My husband called me and told me what my rights were, including the fact that I had the right to walk out of the hospital at any time without signing any papers. Also, the hospital evaluation was Unconstitutional because it was foisted on me without my consent. In so doing, they were violating Fifth Amendment Rights.

After lying to me incessantly about hospital policy and other vital matters, I took a firm stand against the hospital staff in writing. I demanded the proper medications for lowering blood pressure quickly, immediate shoulder surgery, and the release of my bus ticket and taxi ride which I had arranged through the Mormon Church, citing the law, the Constitution, and our family's international law firm. The psychiatrist and his understudy fled my room like scared rabbits, and the hospital staff became docile and compliant.

I escaped the hospital after seventeen days of unnecessary imprisonment. My milk supply was therefore terminated due to the illegal stalling campaign of Jim Abrahamson invading my medical records prior to any case being opened. We have his admission in writing.

The nightmare did not end here.

Arriving home on the Greyhound bus with my pained shoulder in a sling and the residual pain from a fresh C-section incision and healing insides, I embraced my cherished spouse and beheld the mixture of joyful relief and pain in his eyes. He told me that Mr. Abrahamson was trying to serve us papers. A notice had just been posted at our residence from the Sheriff's office.

James explained why we needed to move quickly out of our home for the time being. He had been avoiding service to our residence by leaving early every morning and studying Montana law and the Constitution all day at the local coffee shop. He suggested calling my parents and giving custody of James over to them ahead of C.P.S.'s efforts to seize him, and moving into a local motel on the other side of town until arrangements were made.

I agreed to this plan, and we called my mother that night to explain the present circumstances. The next morning, we paid for a motel and waited for Mr. Woodson to arrive. While waiting for his belated appearance, we called lawyers in Helena to arrange for an appointment. The few lawyers in this small town came off with a strangely reluctant attitude, so we finally secured an appointment with a private lawyer in Missoula, Montana, without mentioning Social Services involvement.

When Mr. Woodson arrived, he feigned good intentions including the desire to rescue our family from the system and to protect our strategy and the privacy of our whereabouts. However, as the evening proceeded and we enjoyed dinner at a restaurant together in Helena, doubts began to arise. Mr. Woodson made the mistake of mentioning the word "Adoption" with an eagerness and kept pushing for us to wait for an attorney to materialize in Helena.

He stated insistently that he would rather take an attorney in Helena where they "know the power structure" of the town, than take an appointment with a lawyer in Missoula. We rejected this suggestion immediately, however, explaining that our appointment in Missoula was secured, and that we had been unable to make one in Helena. Mr. Woodson then agreed that we would go back to our motels next door that evening and drive to the appointment in Missoula the next day after breakfast.

Arriving at our appointment the next day, we met with our intended attorney, a chubby man with an aggressive attitude. When he began to speak to us, he asked us what we wanted to do and why. We stated that we were here in his office to draw up a transfer of custody for our newborn James, for the simple reason that we felt it was in our son's best interest. The attorney then took a thoughtful pause, long enough for Mr. Woodson to interject the following statement:

"I would just like to say something. A C.P.S. social worker in Helena is involved with this case."

Upon this resounding statement, the attorney's demeanor changed as he inquired about more details on this matter. Mr. Woodson then went on to explain that he and his wife Carolyn were in this process of adopting two of my other children in California. He then stated that they would like to include James in their adoption process.

The attorney asked if any prior work had been done regarding their goals, and Mr. Woodson responded by explaining that he had made a phone call to Adoption Specialist Claudia Shockley in California. She had cooperated with Mr. Woodson by sending the records of my closed case in Napa directly to Jim Abrahamson's office in Helena, Montana. The attorney, becoming boldly indignant, then spouted:

"Well you shouldn’t undercut C.P.S. when they wish to intervene!"

Feeling strongly ourselves that C.P.S. shouldn't undercut the sacredness of families and the Constitution, my husband then presented his family's international law firm card of Calvo and Clark in Guam. Looking and talking more angrily, he stated that he would call Jim Abrahamson in Helena. Right then and there, we waited for him to have a short phone conference with Jim Abrahamson.

The attorney excused himself for a short meeting behind closed doors, stating that C.P.S. would drop their fabricated neglect charges and dismiss our case (see "The True Story" under "Wine Country Abduction-Part 2") if we would agree to a legal guardianship, but that if we came back at them with a lawsuit, they would re-try a dismissed case, even though this is illegal. We therefore agreed to the assignment of this guardianship under great duress, and awaited our scheduled Court date back in Helena to have the matter dropped.

It was now Friday, and we had one short weekend of rest before our scheduled Court date in Helena on November 5, 2007.

On November 3rd, we had one meeting with Jim Abrahamson. Mr. Woodson brought up adoption again, but Abrahamson said that they could not do this because it is a process. Then Mr. Woodson mentioned the baby's health as a reason for backing out of a guardianship. Mr. Abrahamson then responded that he would be would be happy to call the hospital right then, which he did, reporting back that the baby was doing fine. Before wrapping up the meeting, James interjected:

"Oh, by the way! We forgot to tell you. Both Sarah and I have Native American heritage". Looking taken aback, Jim and his present supervisor said that this would change everything. We would need a Court date on November 5th to establish this. We had already learned Montana law which stated that the mere claim of ANY Indian heritage disqualified James from state jurisdiction and parental rights terminations.

During the weekend prior to the 5th, we also received an e-mail from Mr. Woodson. He said he was driving to Great Falls, Montana to visit James who was still being held in the hospital, and that he and Carolyn were incapable of adopting James and "raising him to maturity". He suggested giving James to some strangers, a "younger couple" fitting his description of what he deemed to be ideal, hoping we would agree.

We did not answer. Mr. Woodson sent us another e-mail just prior to our 1:30 court date again, asking for a meeting before Court. Again we did not answer.

At the hearing, my attorney grabbed us in to her office and tried to tell me that I would be "losing all my rights" as a mother if I agreed to a guardianship. However, her attempts to deceive me ceased when I told her "not so", because I know full well that guardianships keep parental rights intact. Arriving in the courtroom itself, we then made mention of our Indian heritage which was disregarded.

State Deputy Attorney Carolyn Clemens simply opened the case and placed our son in State jurisdiction for five minutes without any birth certificate yet created for James. They then dismissed the case, handing us non-confidential paperwork stating "Case Dismissed". On the dismissed paperwork, it states that the Montana guardians have permission to live in California, and also that if I received any monies from an estate before the mid-1990's, it must be given to the wealthy guardians.

While standing before us with these papers, Mr. Abrahamson, in an apparent attempt to intimidate one last time, made a veiled threat. He said, "You guys will always be under the spotlight". This statement violated the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which pertains to Cruel and Unusual Punishment.

The ride in Montana was now over, and we headed back to San Francisco on the bus to be near our son for visitation.

To summarize our experience in this city, we lived through about one year of hell. We were never once granted a single visit with James. Mr. Woodson made the promise over the phone to bring James to us at the beginning of our stay in the city. He said, "You will see your son". Instead, he concealed him entirely from his arrival in California until the present time.

After four months of concealing him from us without explanation, (this alone constitutes abduction) we decided to investigate the matter of my defrauded inheritance in the state of Arkansas. I uncovered a great deal of money owed to me which was also needed to help obtain proper housing. I asked my mother to please restore the money that she took from me, but she refused to do so, while continuing to blame me for the housing issue that they and C.P.S. created. They also refused to acknowledge money owed for pain and suffering due to child abduction.

After eight months of total concealment, James called Mr. Woodson again, inquiring about seeing our son. Mr. Woodson said we would never have a chance to see our son due to our Arkansas investigation, which we encourage you to read. (See: Foul Play In Arkansas Story). I then discovered shortly after this statement that Mr. Woodson, Rebecca and Jeffrey Feeney of St. Helena, and Mr. James Vaughn Jones, an attorney in Napa, were involved in a secret wrongful adoption process, and that James was already absent from the Woodson's house.

Mr. Feeney, the abductor, sent us the photo of James that is centered on this website. In this same e-mail that contained his photo, he attempted to serve us with papers for a parental rights termination hearing in Napa, which has no civil jurisdiction over James. In fact, the Woodsons did not even file a guardianship in California.

Concluding Thoughts

For those who view shows such as "Without a Trace", etc. which portrays a romanticized version of majestic heroism, cutting-edge investigation, and valiant concern for justice by U.S. government including agencies such as the F.B.I., etc., understand without mistake that these shows are absolute misrepresentations of reality.

When we contacted the F.B.I., they replied, "What's the urgency?". After contacting Special Agent Matthew Beaupain, he falsely claimed that he had "promised us nothing" and that their agency did not handle Color of Law matters. Is this true? Not according to their website.

The United States government and all its agencies are entirely corrupt, from the local police all the way to Washington, D.C. The only justice that exists operates in accordance with the question, "How much justice can you afford?". For this reason, our country is beyond repair at this time. The only change Americans can hope for is to have their bureaucracy removed and replaced. Under the current system, poor and even middle class Caucasian Americans are seeing their jobs, families, and freedoms destroyed due to the deliberately allowed influx of unauthorized foreigners, and the bullying tactics of our government.

Our "Wine Country Abduction Part 2" Story illustrates how we contacted every possible government agency and individual with the power to solve our problem to no avail. Who would ever think that between the local police, the F.B.I., and even a string of attorneys that we contacted, not one person is capable of arriving at the Feeney's doorstep and picking up our child? When Deputy Bryan Sardoc of Napa County did find him there on a "welfare check" after we reported an abduction, he simply left the child with the abductors, and then closed it without explanation! here is the Case Number: NSD08002427.

If anyone does have an explanation for this, please let us know. And this includes Napa County.

Fair Use Notice And Site, Blog, Social Disclaimer:

2011-07-09T13:55:00.000-07:00

Warning--any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited to the United States Federal Government also using or monitoring/using this Website/Blog/Social Network or any of its associated Websites/Blogs/Social Networks, you do NOT have my permission to utilize any of my profile information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to my photos, and/ or the comments made about my photo's or any other "picture" art posted on my profile AND/OR WEBSITE/BLOG/SOCIAL NETWORK.

You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this profile and the contents herein.

The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee(s), agent(s), student(s) or any personnel under your direction or control. The contents of this profile/ Website/Blog/Social Network are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by law.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.

James Alvin Sablan Sr. is making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.

I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to:

U.S. Code Title 17 Chapter 1 §107 Limitations On Exclusive Rights: Fair Use.

Website/Blog/Social Network Disclaimer: This Website/Blog/Social Network contains information intended for the public and is for general information purposes only.

The information is being provided by James Alvin Sablan Sr. will endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, I make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the Website/Blog/Social Network or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the Website/Blog/Social Network for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. Not responsible for External Website/Blog/Social Network information, links, and copyright infringements.

Pursuant To:

Uniform Commercial Code Article 1 - General Provisions Part 3 §1-308
Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.

(a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as "without prejudice," "under protest," or the like are sufficient.

(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to an accord and satisfaction.

Signed,

James Alvin Sablan Sr., In Sui Juris
A Free Man, Sovereign, Constitutional Rights
Intact & No Rights Are Waived At Any Time.
All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice.

E-Mail: jamessablan@yahoo.com

Public Notice To The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

2010-12-28T11:06:00.000-08:00

To: The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit,

Please take note in the video footage listed below, and you will observe:

Second Judicial District Court State of Nevada County of Washoe
Judge Deborah Schumacher, Department 5
1 South Sierra Street
Reno, NV 89501
(775)328-3186
e-mail: deborah.schumacher@washoecourts.us

ignoring The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Ruling in video 1,

Click on link below to view ruling:

ROGERS V COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN

also the United States Constitution and breaking other various laws.

View below for the full story:

Wine Country Abduction Proven 2010

10 Questions for Rebecca Feeney of Custom Event Group

Google Search Engine Link For Full Video Coverage Of This Story

Story To Be Continued Soon

Complete Court Video:

Rebecca Feeney of Custom Event Group Court Confession Under Oath Updated Part-1

Rebecca Feeney of Custom Event Group Court Confession Under Oath Updated Part-2

Rebecca Feeney of Custom Event Group Court Confession Under Oath Updated Part-3

Rebecca Feeney of Custom Event Group Court Confession Under Oath Updated Part-4

Wine Country Abduction Proven 2010

2010-07-19T13:15:00.001-07:00

10 Questions for Rebecca Feeney of Custom Event Group

Google Search Engine Link For Full Video Coverage Of This Story

Story To Be Continued Soon

Complete Court Video:

Rebecca Feeney of Custom Event Group Court Confession Under Oath Updated Part-1
Rebecca Feeney of Custom Event Group Court Confession Under Oath Updated Part-2

Rebecca Feeney of Custom Event Group Court Confession Under Oath Updated Part-3

Rebecca Feeney of Custom Event Group Court Confession Under Oath Updated Part-4

Wine Country Abduction

2010-07-19T13:01:00.000-07:00

Legal Disclaimer

Washington Post Forum Postings

Washington Post Forum Profile/Legal Disclaimer

Mayor of Yountville

Cynthia Saucerman

6550 Yount Street

Yountville, CA 94599

Phone: 707-948-2636

e-mail: csaucerman@yville.com

Mayor of St. Helena

Del Britton

(707) 963-5635 (h)

City of St. Helena

1480 Main Street, St. Helena, CA 94574

Mayor Of Napa

Jill Techel

c/o City Hall 955 School Street

PO Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660

Work Phone: 707-258-7876

E-mail: jtechel@cityofnapa.org

Mayor Of Napa Jill Techel - Home

1075 Round Hill Cir.

Napa, CA 94558-5320

Home Phone: 707-255-6054

E-mail: MayorJill@aol.com

Napa County District Attorney

Gary Allen Lieberstein

Duties as Public Prosecutor

931 Parkway Mall

Napa, CA 94559-2647

Office Phone

(707) 253-4211

Office Fax

(707) 253-4041

e-mail: District_Attorney_Office@co.napa.ca.us

Harry V. Martin

Napa Board Of Supervisors Candidate

1627 Lincoln Ave

Napa, CA 94558-4827

(707) 253-8186

e-mail: sentinel@napanet.net

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger

State Capitol Building

Sacramento, CA 95814

Phone: 916-445-2841

Fax: 916-558-3160

e-mail: governor@govmail.ca.gov

President George W. Bush

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 2050

Phone Numbers:

Comments: 202-456-1111

Switchboard: 202-456-1414

FAX: 202-456-2461

e-mail: president@whitehouse.gov

And the City and County of Napa, The State of California, United States et al:

Video Of Our Son

Updated: The True Story - Authentic Document

Authentic F.B.I. Receipts For Under Color Of Law Complaint Form

Parental Rights Documented: Proof

The Reason Custom Event Group Breaks The Law:

Original E-Mail To The Mayors

Note: Click On This Web Link Below And See How Close:

Mayor of Yountville - Home

Cynthia Saucerman

2011 Webber Ave

Yountville, CA 94599-1379

(707) 944-1852

Lives To The Perpetrators:

Criminal Behavior Profile 1

Criminal Behavior Profile 2

Alfred Richard Woodson III and

Rev. Carolyn Lorraine Strong Woodson

2004 Humboldt Street

Yountville, California 94559

Home Phone: 707-944-2038

e-mail: woodsonar@sbcglobal.net

e-mail: cswoodson@sbcglobal.net

Google Map

The Guardians, Alfred Richard Woodson III and

Carolyn Lorraine Strong Woodson,

Have Violated The California Penal Codes:

Neglect-Abandonment-Conspiracy-Concealment

Abduction- False Imprisonment- Kidnapping.

Click On This Link: California Penal Code

Mayors Of The Napa Valley Attention: Abduction

Jeffrey Feeney’s Criminal Background Attached and

Case Lookup Web Link And Contact Information Listed Below:

Click On Link Below And Type In The Name Jeffrey Feeney And Click Submit:

Napa County Case Lookup

Prima Facie On This Day Of June 12th 2008

On Sunday, June 8, 2008, it was reported to my fiancé,

James A. Sablan Sr., and myself, Sarah Lorraine Matlock,

that our infant son, James Matlock Funes, was abducted/illegally

adopted by the individuals listed below, and is presently in imminent

danger. I am enclosing attaching Jeffrey Feeney’s criminal background:

Jeffrey and Rebecca Feeney

Unlawful Custodians Detaining And Concealing “Child”

1094 Valley View St.

Saint Helena, CA 94574-2346

Phone: (707) 968-9445

Cell Number: (707) 580-5678

Fax number (707) 968-9437

with the assistance of:

James Vaughn Jones

Attorney At Law

State Bar Number: 40883

1564 First Street

Napa, CA, 94559

Work Phone: (707) 252-8644

E-mail: onecal1@saber.net

Our parental rights have not been terminated,

and there is no California jurisdiction over our child.

We are seeking the immediate return of our son.

This was reported to us directly by Sarah Matlock’s

older son, Jeffrey Alexander Funes, who has been

living in this house from which he was abducted.

We also have evidence in writing that this was

premeditated by the perpetrators,

who are Montana-appointed guardians of our baby.

They have no paperwork filed in the State of California

and no legal adoption papers filed in the Napa Courthouse.

Prior to this, the baby had also been maliciously concealed

by the perpetrators for approximately eight months, for

which we also have proof.

We have evidence in writing and by eyewitnesses that this

adoption had already been in process, and this fact was

also confirmed by:

Investigator: William Jabin

Napa County District Attorney’s Office Child Abduction Unit

931 Parkway Mall

Napa, CA 94559-2647

Work: (707) 253-4356

e-mail: WJABIN@co.napa.ca.us

Amazingly, Napa County is not concerned about this crime

whatsoever. After confirming the facts of the carrying-out

of the adoption to Bill Jabin and Yountville law enforcement

on Monday, June 9th, we have been ignored and even blamed

for the crime.

Sergeant Berg of Yountville indicated that the criminal

abduction and illegal conspiracy was our fault because we are

bad people and that he was going to do nothing about it. Bill

Jabin has ignored our concerned phone calls for four days.

Harry Martin has been informed, and Neil Bowman Davis, the

Family Law Facilitator at the Self Help Center in the Napa

Courthouse, was informed. Regarding concealment alone,the

District Attorney should have picked up charges on this months

ago, since Napa County authorities were aware of the crime

months ago.

We know for a fact that if this crime was perpetrated by low

income people, the system would have completed a child

welfare check the first day that such a report came in. But the

conscientious Napa County authorities did nothing. This is due

to the corruption and favoritism of the rich in Napa County.

There has been not so much as one simple child welfare check at

the Feeney’s house to verify Jeffrey Funes report that our child is

there. In fact, there has not even been a single police report taken

with a number assigned to it by Sergeant Berg or the Napa Police,

who were also called on June 9, 2008. It is illegal not to take a

police report and assign a number to it when a crime is reported.

We are going to expose this matter. We have many ways of doing

this which include the use of the Internet. The information we have

includes all correspondence made with authorities, non-confidential

paperwork, and incriminating e-mail evidence.

Obviously, upon the report of an abduction, a police report should

have been taken the first day, and a welfare check completed

immediately. Upon finding the child where he reported to be living

at this time, the parties should also have been arrested and require

to show any and all paperwork they have concerning any legal tie to

the child (which of course would be fraudulent).

We are, quite frankly, appalled by the irresponsible, uncouth

behaviors and attitudes of the Napa authorities, their haughtiness

and evident favoritism toward the wealthy, and the lawlessness

that they are endorsing through their negligence. Apparently they

have some type of strange agenda given the fact that if our facts

were incorrect, Jabin should have already called and verified this.

There is no need for a lengthy investigation to resolve this.

We are requesting your assistance in bringing an end to the

perpetuation of this serious crime since you have the power

and influence as Mayor of Napa, Mayor of St. Helena and

Mayor of Yountville, Napa County District Attorney Gary

Allen Lieberstein, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, and

President George W. Bush to make this happen.

We have already informed the guardians of their violations of

the U.S. Statutes which are:

U.S. CODE TITLE 42-THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE

CHAPTER 21-CIVIL RIGHTS SUB CHAPTER-GENERALLY

Sec. 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights.

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance,

regulation,custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or

the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected,

any citizen of the United States orother person within the

jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of anyrights, privileges,

or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws,

shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in

equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in

any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or

omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive

relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was

violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes

of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the

District of Columbiashall be considered to be a statute of the District

of Columbia.

(R.S. Sec. 1979; Pub. L. 96-170, Sec.1, Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284;

Pub. L. 104-317, title III, Sec.309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853.)

Codification

R.S. Sec. 1979 derived from act Apr.20, 1871, ch. 22, Sec. 1, 17

Stat. 13.

Section was formerly classified to section 43 of Title 8, Aliens and

Nationality.

Amendments

1996-Pub. L. 104-317 inserted before period at end of first

sentence “, except that in any action brought against a judicial

officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial

capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory

decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable”.

1979-Pub. L. 96-170 inserted “or the District of Columbia” after

“Territory”, and provisions relating to Acts of Congress applicable

solely to the District of Columbia.

Effective Date of 1979 Amendment

Amendment for deprivation of rights, privileges, or immunities

secured by the Constitution and laws occurring after Dec. 29, 1979,

see section 3 of Pub. L. 96-170, set out as a note under section 1343

of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

U.S. CODE TITLE 42-THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE

CHAPTER 21-CIVIL RIGHTS SUB CHAPTER I-GENERALLY

Sec. 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights.

(1) Preventing officer from performing duties

If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to

prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting

or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United

States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to induce by like

means any officer of the United States to leave any State, district, or

place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or

to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful

discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful

discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt,

hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties;

(2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror

If by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of

the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any

matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such

party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so

attended or testified, or to influence the verdict, presentment, or

indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure

such juror in his person or property on account of any verdict,

presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being

or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the

purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any

manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent

to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure

him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce,

the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of

the laws;

(3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges

If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in

disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose

of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of

persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and

immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering

the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or

securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal

protection of the laws; or if two or more persons conspire to prevent by

force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to

vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or

in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector

for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the

United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account

of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this

section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done,

any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another

is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and

exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the

party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of

damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or

more of the conspirators.

(R.S. Sec. 1980.)

Codification

R.S. Sec. 1980 derived from acts July 31, 1861, ch. 33, 12 Stat.

284; Apr. 20, 1871, ch. 22, Sec. 2, 17 Stat. 13.

Section was formerly classified to section 47 of Title 8, Aliens and

Nationality.

U.S. CODE TITLE 42-THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE

CHAPTER 21-CIVIL RIGHTS SUBCHAPTER I-GENERALLY

Sec. 1986. Action for neglect to prevent

Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired

to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this title, are about to

be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the

commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful

act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal

representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such

person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages

may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons

guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants

in the action; and if the death of any party be caused by any such

wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased

shall have such action there for, and may recover not exceeding $5,000

damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there

be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of

kin of the deceased. But no action under the provisions of this section

shall be sustained which is not commenced within one year after the

cause of action has accrued.

(R.S. Sec. 1981.)

Codification

R.S. Sec. 1981 derived from act Apr.20, 1871, ch. 22, Sec. 6, 17

Stat. 15.

Section was formerly classified to section 48 of Title 8, Aliens and

Nationality.

Furthermore, we are informing you of the following U.S. Statutes

that apply to you upon any possible failure to comply with U. S.

Statutes listed above and below, this becomes a U.S. Code Title

18 Violation, as also listed below after Title 42 listed below. Please see the following:

U.S. CODE TITLE 42-THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE

CHAPTER 21-CIVIL RIGHTS SUB CHAPTER I-GENERALLY

Sec. 1986. Action for neglect to prevent

1) United States Code Title 18, Part-1Chapter-13 Section 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights).

2) United States Code Title 18, Part-1Chapter-13 Section 242 (Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law).

Thank you for your valuable time,

and we wish to hear from you soon.

Please us e-mail us back at your

earliest convenience.

Pursuant To:

Uniform Commercial Code - Article1-General Provisions Part 2 §1-207

Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights.

(1) A party who with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance

or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not

thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as “without prejudice”, “under protest”

or the like are sufficient.

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to an accord and satisfaction.

Signed,

James A. Sablan Sr. and Sarah L. Matlock

e-mail: jamessablan@yahoo.com

e-mail: woodsonsarah@yahoo.com